Charismatics 'are unbiblical'


This is interesting and I hope some of the brighter lights in Newfrontiers will take up the challenge that John MacArthur lays down here as he articulates a cessationist view of scripture and church history.

Now I know that what is called the charismatic movement in the UK is not entirely the same as in the US. We (mostly) have an equal distaste for the prosperity movement although we’re still too prone to fall like a teenager in love for any hint of revival (or at least revival where English is spoken, decent hotels and flight connections and no persecution).

Anyway here are some of the charges that MacArthur lays at our door:

“In virtually every area where church life is unbiblical, you can attribute it to the charismatic movement. In virtually every area — bad theology, superficial worship, ego, prosperity gospel, personality elevation — all of that comes out of the charismatic movement.”

“It’s theology is bad, it is unbiblical, it is aberrant, it is destructive to people because it promises them what it can’t deliver, and then God gets blamed when it doesn’t come. It is a very destructive movement. It has always been.”

“…the movement in itself, with all its components, is a disaster to the reputation of Christianity and a severe corruption of biblical teaching.”

Come on John, don’t be timid tell us what you really think!

There are few weak arguments to back his view up but even then they’re spicy.

“Apostolic gifts ceased. You can go to the end of book of Acts: you see healings disappear completely, people get sick and there’s no one around to make them well.”

“Do you think God would give Benny Hinn the power to do miracles to authenticate really bad theology? . . . I mean, that is ludicrous. . . . If those gifts existed, they would belong to the purest, most faithful, sound teachers of the Word of God to authenticate their teaching, not to hair-brained people who are just spinning out whatever comes into their head and are prompted by Satan, not the Holy Spirit.”

“You don’t read, for example, if you read the Anabaptists, read the Reformers, read the Puritans, they’re not debating tongues, because they didn’t exist.”

MacArthur did make some slight begrudging concessions towards the likes of Piper, Grudem and Mahaney but it just shows that in the reformed world there remains some significant bridges to cross and why conferences like this one last summer are invaluable.


Discover more from The Simple Pastor

Enjoyed this? Subscribe to The Simple Pastor to get the latest posts sent to your email.

5 responses

  1. Ah, the usual “You can’t be doing this because my theology says it’s impossible” argument. (What I call the “anti-Acts 11”.) You have to be ignorant of pretty much all of Church history to make that claim and you have to shut your eyes to what is actually happening in churches today.

    I wrote a rant about this madness at http://www.simon-cozens.org/content/cessationism-why-does-anyone-go-out-bat-madness

    1. Great rant, really enjoyed it and excellent opening on what cessationists are implying without realising it

  2. I should add that if you want a book that traces the charismatic through church history, you could do worse than “More” by Simon Ponsonby.

    1. That’s a book I’ve been meaning to read for years but never quite got round to. I may just do so now. Thanks

  3. Excellent point gents. But I would argue that by dismissing prosperity you are both making the same mistake as MacArthur is about charismaticism in general.

    For example roughly a quarter of Britain’s Christian population is based in London. While hard and fast statistics are difficult to come by, the lastest academic conference papers I have read (full research is not pending) suggest that half of the 10 largest churches are prosperity based or influenced. If this is any kind of indicator of how widespread this teaching (and teachings related to it) is – are you really ready to dismiss this as arrogantly as MacArthur does charismaticism?

    I am not saying there aren’t problems and excesses. We all know there are. All I am saying is that it is too easy to pull out the same kind of “anti-Acts 11” arguments (thank you Simon) for this as it is for other contested beliefs.

    I would love to engage with thinking charismatics like yourselves on this subject as I am sure that I could learn a lot.

    I have a blog here, if you are interested: http://onewaypublishing.co.uk/blog

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Discover more from The Simple Pastor

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading